PsyOps - Revision history

>CrackRabbit: on github backup this redircts to Social Engineering , but i'm just adding a link to it as a see also section

2013-05-25T23:46:23Z

on github backup this redircts to Social Engineering , but i'm just adding a link to it as a see also section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:46, 25 May 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~#REDIRECT~~ [[Social Engineering]]		'''Psychological Operations''' (PSYOP, PSYOPS) are techniques used to influence a target audience's emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and behavior. The target audience is usually the userbase of a target website, and PsyOps are used in order to induce confessions, or reinforce attitudes and behaviors favorable to the objectives at hand. These are sometimes combined with black operations.

			This concept has been used by military institutions throughout history. /i/'s first concerted attempt at PsyOps was during the [[Longcat Crusade]], where it was used to enormous and advantageous effect--turning a large part of the [[Subeta]] userbase against the admins and Owner. Psyops are usually employed in LARGE raids, that require the decimation of an entire population of forumgoers and the breakdown of admin-user relations.

			Psyops must be willing to (at least temporarily) become the thing they hate. They must embed themselves into the organizational structure of a site and agree. agree with everything. However, the psyop's skill comes in they way he phrases his agreement. Consider this: The site owner says something along the lines of, "So, these eBaums fags are really assholes." The user will say, "Yeah! I hate them!!!" The PsyOp says, "They are! But we shouldn't call them fags...that's intolerant."

			The difference is subtle, but meaningful. You have agreed with the admins, but you have also pointed out that the admins are intolerant. As you post more, the more dissent you can spread... while completely agreeing and following the TOS and/or EULA.

			'''BONUS LEVEL:''' [http://anonym.to/http://419eater.com 419eater] is a site where some good-doers want you to troll Nigerian scammers to distract them, which can get some lulz and you can fuck with them all you want. By going through multiple scambaitings, any /i/nsurgent will become a master at the fine and subtle art of PsyOps.

			== Techniques to master ==

			If you plan to converse/debate with targets read the following and make sure you know how they work MASTER THEM!.

			=== Bootcamp Version ===

			==== For Newfags ====

			* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disinformation] DisInformation (False sources)
			* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoating] Scapegoat (blame it on someone else)
			* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_assertion] Proof by assertion (they love dis)
			* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion] Appeal to emotion (basic foundations for psyops)
			* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man] Misrepresenting a position
			* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glittering_generalities] Pick your wordz wisely

			'''Also familiarize yourself with these methods and their consequences''':

			* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_propaganda] Black Propaganda
			* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_propaganda] Grey Propaganda
			* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_propaganda] White Propaganda (Do it for the lulz)

			==== For pros ====

			These are much longer and more difficult to understand. So make sure you re-read and master.

			* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_Hominem] Ad Hominem (basic way they use to attack)
			* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma] False Dilemma (limiting your choices)
			* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring_fallacy] Red Herring (going off topic)
			* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-truth] Half truth
			* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_Hitlerum] Reductio ad Hitlerum

			=== University Psyops ===

			Just read and memorize every technique at the bottom of this page, an you'll do just fine.

			[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignoratio_elenchi The Page].

			=== Protips ===

			* if you need to lie (which you shouldn't because we seem to be 'in the clear') make sure your lies are around 90% truth and only 10% lie. This makes it much harder to disprove, and if the subject decides to research on their own, they will find the truth then see your argument as creditable. If they find anything disproving, also this adds reasoning that the person, merely miscommunicated rather then lie directly to the target.

			* People generally will generally convince themselves when it comes to falshoods, the best thing to do is provide the groundwork and let their minds work against them. (someonewhat stated above)

			* Details are the absolute most important thing there is. Several small things are infinitely more likely to pass you off as a true member of the community than a huge red fucking banner on your myspace proclaiming 'I HEART YIFF' or whatever applies. Once again, people generally convince themselves far more effectively than anyone else ever could. All you have to do is lay the path and put the rose petals down.

			* At the same time, too much detail is a bad thing. If a new user demonstrates encyclopaedic knowledge of the target community, people will become suspicious.

			* If you need a guide on how to troll through arguments, and need more help on the argument itself, see [[Forum Trolling]].

			==Keeping the conversation going==

			I'm no expert PsyOp, but this is one major hole in my learning. I went straight into practical stuff, and with a one on one conversation with people - I continue to run out of things to say, can someone maybe write up a decent article on this? Prease?

			Sounds like a good idea, anyone got any ideas to help?

			==see also==
			*[[Social Engineering]]
			<br>
			<br>
			[[Category:Methods]]
			[[Category:Tutorials]]

>Psycatalyst: Redirected page to Social Engineering

2011-05-14T16:05:56Z

Redirected page to Social Engineering

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 14 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Psychological Operations''' (PSYOP, PSYOPS) are techniques used to influence a target audience's emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and behavior. The target audience is usually the userbase of a target website, and PsyOps are used in order to induce confessions, or reinforce attitudes and behaviors favorable to the objectives at hand. These are sometimes combined with black operations.

	This concept has been used by military institutions throughout history. /i/'s first concerted attempt at PsyOps was during the [[Longcat Crusade]], where it was used to enormous and advantageous effect--turning a large part of the [[Subeta]] userbase against the admins and Owner. Psyops are usually employed in LARGE raids, that require the decimation of an entire population of forumgoers and the breakdown of admin-user relations.

	Psyops must be willing to (at least temporarily) become the thing they hate. They must embed themselves into the organizational structure of a site and agree. agree with everything. However, the psyop's skill comes in they way he phrases his agreement. Consider this: The site owner says something along the lines of, "So, these eBaums fags are really assholes." The user will say, "Yeah! I hate them!!!" The PsyOp says, "They are! But we shouldn't call them fags...that's intolerant."

	The difference is subtle, but meaningful. You have agreed with the admins, but you have also pointed out that the admins are intolerant. As you post more, the more dissent you can spread... while completely agreeing and following the TOS and/or EULA.

	'''BONUS LEVEL:''' [http://anonym.to/http://419eater.com 419eater] is a site where some good-doers want you to troll Nigerian scammers to distract them, which can get some lulz and you can fuck with them all you want. By going through multiple scambaitings, any /i/nsurgent will become a master at the fine and subtle art of PsyOps.

	~~==[[Releases/MilitaryPack\|Ask the Military]]==~~
	The military has been trying to win battles via mindfuck for years. [[Releases/MilitaryPack\|This]] is a pack of several related documents/memos that have been circulated, purportedly from the military itself.


	#REDIRECT [[Social Engineering]]		#REDIRECT [[Social Engineering]]

	~~==Keeping the conversation going==~~
	--
	I'm no expert PsyOp, but this is one major hole in my learning. I went straight into practical stuff, and with a one on one conversation with people - I continue to run out of things to say, can someone maybe write up a decent article on this? Prease?

	~~Sounds like a good idea, anyone got any ideas to help?~~
	--

	~~Research the topic before attacking, the more known, the more that can be said.~~

	Mix what has been learnt, by using a Straw Man tactic, measure the target, an ignorant target cannot differentiate and will become defensive, even agreeing, while an astute individual will counterattack, citing the misinterpretation. The previous permits time for discussion over the targets platform and interpretation without initiating an actual argument. Do not be afraid to agree with the target, it catches them off guard giving time to think or reassess a situation.

	~~Question them thoroughly. A question is a sentence long, an explanation is not.~~

	~~Scrutinize. Things have different meanings in different contexts.~~

	~~Draw inferences, if somebody can do A, then what keeps them from B.~~

	~~Bait the target, make intentional false assertions to keep them talking.~~

	~~Nip at their heels, instead of attacking the central point of the argument, attack the surrounding assumptions or items.~~

	~~[[Category:Methods]]~~
	~~[[Category:Tutorials]]~~

>Psycatalyst: Merge w SE plus some FAGGOT copied the page to ED. This is basically the same as SE

2011-05-14T16:04:43Z

Merge w SE plus some FAGGOT copied the page to ED. This is basically the same as SE

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 14 May 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:


	~~== Techniques to master ==~~		#REDIRECT [[Social Engineering]]

	~~If you plan to converse/debate with targets read the following and make sure you know how they work MASTER THEM!.~~

	~~=== Bootcamp Version ===~~

	~~==== For Newfags ====~~

	* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disinformation] DisInformation (False sources)
	* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoating] Scapegoat (blame it on someone else)
	* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_assertion] Proof by assertion (they love dis)
	* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion] Appeal to emotion (basic foundations for psyops)
	* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man] Misrepresenting a position
	* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glittering_generalities] Pick your wordz wisely

	~~'''Also familiarize yourself with these methods and their consequences''':~~

	* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_propaganda] Black Propaganda
	* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_propaganda] Grey Propaganda
	* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_propaganda] White Propaganda (Do it for the lulz)

	~~==== For pros ====~~

	~~These are much longer and more difficult to understand. So make sure you re-read and master.~~

	* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_Hominem] Ad Hominem (basic way they use to attack)
	* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma] False Dilemma (limiting your choices)
	* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring_fallacy] Red Herring (going off topic)
	* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-truth] Half truth
	* [http://anonym.to/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_Hitlerum] Reductio ad Hitlerum

	~~=== University Psyops ===~~

	~~Just read and memorize every technique at the bottom of this page, an you'll do just fine.~~

	~~[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignoratio_elenchi The Page].~~

	~~=== Protips ===~~

	* if you need to lie (which you shouldn't because we seem to be 'in the clear') make sure your lies are around 90% truth and only 10% lie. This makes it much harder to disprove, and if the subject decides to research on their own, they will find the truth then see your argument as creditable. If they find anything disproving, also this adds reasoning that the person, merely miscommunicated rather then lie directly to the target.

	* People generally will generally convince themselves when it comes to falshoods, the best thing to do is provide the groundwork and let their minds work against them. (someonewhat stated above)

	* Details are the absolute most important thing there is. Several small things are infinitely more likely to pass you off as a true member of the community than a huge red fucking banner on your myspace proclaiming 'I HEART YIFF' or whatever applies. Once again, people generally convince themselves far more effectively than anyone else ever could. All you have to do is lay the path and put the rose petals down.

	* At the same time, too much detail is a bad thing. If a new user demonstrates encyclopaedic knowledge of the target community, people will become suspicious.

	* If you need a guide on how to troll through arguments, and need more help on the argument itself, see [[~~Forum Trolling~~]].

	* Learn the Rules of Inference, such a Modus Tollens. Learning basic propositional logic teaches how to dissect and build arguments mechanically. Eg: If A and B are true, then C must be true (each person CHOOSES what A and B are, so even if D is false, by only exposing A and B, the argument is true to the uninformed)

	==Keeping the conversation going==		==Keeping the conversation going==

>DeusEx: /* Techniques to master */

2010-09-25T01:29:20Z

Techniques to master

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:29, 25 September 2010
Line 61:		Line 61:

	* If you need a guide on how to troll through arguments, and need more help on the argument itself, see [[Forum Trolling]].		* If you need a guide on how to troll through arguments, and need more help on the argument itself, see [[Forum Trolling]].

			* Learn the Rules of Inference, such a Modus Tollens. Learning basic propositional logic teaches how to dissect and build arguments mechanically. Eg: If A and B are true, then C must be true (each person CHOOSES what A and B are, so even if D is false, by only exposing A and B, the argument is true to the uninformed)

	==Keeping the conversation going==		==Keeping the conversation going==

>DeusEx: /* Keeping the conversation going */

2010-09-25T01:20:36Z

Keeping the conversation going

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:20, 25 September 2010
Line 69:		Line 69:
	--		--

	Research the topic before attacking, the more known, the more that can be said. Mix what has been learnt, by using a Straw Man tactic, measure the target, an ignorant target cannot differentiate and will become defensive, even agreeing, while an astute individual will counterattack, citing the misinterpretation.. The previous permits time for discussion over the targets platform and interpretation without initiating an actual argument. Do not be afraid to agree with the target, it catches them off guard giving time to think or reassess a situation. ~~Be sure to question~~ them thoroughly~~, a~~ question is a sentence long, an explanation is not. Scrutinize~~, things~~ have different meanings in different contexts. Draw inferences, if somebody can do A, then what keeps them from B. Bait the target, make intentional false assertions to keep them talking. Nip at their heels, instead of attacking the central point of the argument, attack the surrounding assumptions or items.		Research the topic before attacking, the more known, the more that can be said.

			Mix what has been learnt, by using a Straw Man tactic, measure the target, an ignorant target cannot differentiate and will become defensive, even agreeing, while an astute individual will counterattack, citing the misinterpretation. The previous permits time for discussion over the targets platform and interpretation without initiating an actual argument. Do not be afraid to agree with the target, it catches them off guard giving time to think or reassess a situation.

			Question them thoroughly. A question is a sentence long, an explanation is not.

			Scrutinize. Things have different meanings in different contexts.

			Draw inferences, if somebody can do A, then what keeps them from B.

			Bait the target, make intentional false assertions to keep them talking.

			Nip at their heels, instead of attacking the central point of the argument, attack the surrounding assumptions or items.

	[[Category:Methods]]		[[Category:Methods]]
	[[Category:Tutorials]]		[[Category:Tutorials]]

>DeusEx: /* Keeping the conversation going */

2010-09-25T01:19:19Z

Keeping the conversation going

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:19, 25 September 2010
Line 63:		Line 63:

	==Keeping the conversation going==		==Keeping the conversation going==
			--
	I'm no expert PsyOp, but this is one major hole in my learning. I went straight into practical stuff, and with a one on one conversation with people - I continue to run out of things to say, can someone maybe write up a decent article on this? Prease?		I'm no expert PsyOp, but this is one major hole in my learning. I went straight into practical stuff, and with a one on one conversation with people - I continue to run out of things to say, can someone maybe write up a decent article on this? Prease?

	Sounds like a good idea, anyone got any ideas to help?		Sounds like a good idea, anyone got any ideas to help?
			--

			Research the topic before attacking, the more known, the more that can be said. Mix what has been learnt, by using a Straw Man tactic, measure the target, an ignorant target cannot differentiate and will become defensive, even agreeing, while an astute individual will counterattack, citing the misinterpretation.. The previous permits time for discussion over the targets platform and interpretation without initiating an actual argument. Do not be afraid to agree with the target, it catches them off guard giving time to think or reassess a situation. Be sure to question them thoroughly, a question is a sentence long, an explanation is not. Scrutinize, things have different meanings in different contexts. Draw inferences, if somebody can do A, then what keeps them from B. Bait the target, make intentional false assertions to keep them talking. Nip at their heels, instead of attacking the central point of the argument, attack the surrounding assumptions or items.

	[[Category:Methods]]		[[Category:Methods]]
	[[Category:Tutorials]]		[[Category:Tutorials]]

>Hitlerlol at 03:20, 2 August 2010

2010-08-02T03:20:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:20, 2 August 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:

	'''BONUS LEVEL:''' [http://anonym.to/http://419eater.com 419eater] is a site where some good-doers want you to troll Nigerian scammers to distract them, which can get some lulz and you can fuck with them all you want. By going through multiple scambaitings, any /i/nsurgent will become a master at the fine and subtle art of PsyOps.		'''BONUS LEVEL:''' [http://anonym.to/http://419eater.com 419eater] is a site where some good-doers want you to troll Nigerian scammers to distract them, which can get some lulz and you can fuck with them all you want. By going through multiple scambaitings, any /i/nsurgent will become a master at the fine and subtle art of PsyOps.

			==[[Releases/MilitaryPack\|Ask the Military]]==
			The military has been trying to win battles via mindfuck for years. [[Releases/MilitaryPack\|This]] is a pack of several related documents/memos that have been circulated, purportedly from the military itself.


	== Techniques to master ==		== Techniques to master ==

>RyanDurden: /* Keeping the conversation going */

2009-04-29T03:23:39Z

Keeping the conversation going

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:23, 29 April 2009
(No difference)

>RyanDurden: /* Keeping the conversation going */

2009-04-29T03:23:39Z

Keeping the conversation going

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:23, 29 April 2009
Line 62:		Line 62:
	I'm no expert PsyOp, but this is one major hole in my learning. I went straight into practical stuff, and with a one on one conversation with people - I continue to run out of things to say, can someone maybe write up a decent article on this? Prease?		I'm no expert PsyOp, but this is one major hole in my learning. I went straight into practical stuff, and with a one on one conversation with people - I continue to run out of things to say, can someone maybe write up a decent article on this? Prease?

			Sounds like a good idea, anyone got any ideas to help?
	[[Category:Methods]]		[[Category:Methods]]
	[[Category:Tutorials]]		[[Category:Tutorials]]

>RyanDurden at 13:33, 21 April 2009

2009-04-21T13:33:13Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:33, 21 April 2009
(No difference)