Talk:Church of Anon - Revision history

68.225.8.248: /* Really? */

2009-02-03T02:07:52Z

Really?

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:07, 3 February 2009
(No difference)

2009-02-03T02:07:52Z

Really?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:07, 3 February 2009
Line 39:		Line 39:

	--[[User:FICAS McVeigh\|FICAS McVeigh]] 05:07, 4 January 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:FICAS McVeigh\|FICAS McVeigh]] 05:07, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

			*Very good point. The point of this thing shouldn't be bashing other religions. Taking a few potshots at the Christfags is okay with me, but that shouldn't make up the main body of the religion.

2009-02-03T02:05:15Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:05, 3 February 2009
(No difference)

2009-02-03T02:05:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:05, 3 February 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This idea could work, but it looks like it has a huge probability of becoming more moralfaggotry like Chanology. Just remember no irl bullshit like handing out fliers or protesting, that's just retarded.		This idea could work, but it looks like it has a huge probability of becoming more moralfaggotry like Chanology. Just remember no irl bullshit like handing out fliers or protesting, that's just retarded.

			*I concur. Be VERY FUCKING CAREFUL. By the way, I think it would be a good idea to toss something in the book about how only moralfags wear Guy Fawkes masks.

	== hmm... ==		== hmm... ==

2009-01-04T05:07:14Z

Really?

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:07, 4 January 2009
(No difference)

2009-01-04T05:07:14Z

Really?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:07, 4 January 2009
Line 35:		Line 35:

	Who says we need official government recognition and crap? This could be turned into something like the Flying Spaghetti Monster, but with more lulz? Not so sure, we probably don't want to be FSM ripoff with Mudkips...		Who says we need official government recognition and crap? This could be turned into something like the Flying Spaghetti Monster, but with more lulz? Not so sure, we probably don't want to be FSM ripoff with Mudkips...

			--[[User:FICAS McVeigh\|FICAS McVeigh]] 05:07, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

2009-01-04T05:04:17Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:04, 4 January 2009
(No difference)

2009-01-04T05:04:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:04, 4 January 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:

	-[[User:MARTIN_VAN_BUREAN\|MARTIN_VAN_BUREAN]]		-[[User:MARTIN_VAN_BUREAN\|MARTIN_VAN_BUREAN]]

			== Really? ==

			Hate to bring in Chanology shit, but if you need all of that crap to become IRS recognized religion, how the fuck did Scientology get tax free status? It sounds like it should be easy enough to BS our way to tax free status if we really wanted it (including signatures and "church leaders", cause we could get some people to namefag). Not that we really want to make this IRL... (from what I understand)

			OR

			Who says we need official government recognition and crap? This could be turned into something like the Flying Spaghetti Monster, but with more lulz? Not so sure, we probably don't want to be FSM ripoff with Mudkips...

2008-12-23T20:47:38Z

Religion Status

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:47, 23 December 2008
(No difference)

2008-12-23T20:47:38Z

Religion Status

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:47, 23 December 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:
	== Religion Status ==		== Religion Status ==

	The courts have upheld that the government should stay out of deciding what is or isnt a religion. Government agencies are not experts in theology and should not determine the validity or fallacy of any system of beleifs~~. Below is a link to a discussion of different legal opinions that have both broadened and limited our governments view of what constitutes a "religion~~.		The courts have upheld that the government should stay out of deciding what is or isnt a religion. Government agencies are not experts in theology and should not determine the validity or fallacy of any system of beleifs.
			The IRS does have a list of criteria that they use to determine whether or not an organization should be granted tax free status. Those criteria are:
	~~However the~~ IRS does have a list of criteria that they use to determine whether or not an organization should be granted tax free status. Those criteria are:
	1. a distinct legal existence,		1. a distinct legal existence,
	2. a recognized creed and form of worship,		2. a recognized creed and form of worship,