Talk:Jonathan Krohn - Revision history

>Maxwell: Reverted edits by 207.119.71.76 (Talk) to last version by Maxwell

2009-03-25T22:45:01Z

Reverted edits by 207.119.71.76 (Talk) to last version by Maxwell

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:45, 25 March 2009
(No difference)

>Maxwell: Reverted edits by 207.119.71.76 (Talk) to last version by Maxwell

2009-03-25T22:45:01Z

Reverted edits by 207.119.71.76 (Talk) to last version by Maxwell

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 This was on 711 and everyone simultaniously decided it sucked.
-Attacking  of who they are. And some anons seem to think that way as well and either act beneficially or negatively towards the raid. [[User:Treybuchet|Treybuchet]] 15:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
+Attacking someone because you dont like there political beliefs is the kind of beekeeping that got chanology going.
 ::::On the other hand, polifags and religious fags tend to be extremely easy to troll due to their oversensitivity and attachment to popular correctness. I definitely see your argument though, you have a good point, but honestly

207.119.71.76 at 01:53, 25 March 2009

2009-03-25T01:53:07Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:53, 25 March 2009
(No difference)

207.119.71.76 at 01:53, 25 March 2009

2009-03-25T01:53:07Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 This was on 711 and everyone simultaniously decided it sucked.
-Attacking someone because you dont like there political beliefs is the kind of beekeeping that got chanology going.
+Attacking  of who they are. And some anons seem to think that way as well and either act beneficially or negatively towards the raid. [[User:Treybuchet|Treybuchet]] 15:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 ::::On the other hand, polifags and religious fags tend to be extremely easy to troll due to their oversensitivity and attachment to popular correctness. I definitely see your argument though, you have a good point, but honestly

>Maxwell at 03:38, 23 March 2009

2009-03-23T03:38:41Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:38, 23 March 2009
(No difference)

>Maxwell at 03:38, 23 March 2009

2009-03-23T03:38:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:38, 23 March 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::On the other hand, polifags and religious fags tend to be extremely easy to troll due to their oversensitivity and attachment to popular correctness. I definitely see your argument though, you have a good point, but honestly I hope Krohn thinks we are raiding him for his beliefs, as it will make him more likely to bawww about how terrorists are persecuting him. The real problem is anons who think that we are doing this because he is conservative. I am not sure how to prevent that, I think I will put a little warning at the top that says "IF YOU ARE DOING THIS WITH POLITICAL MOTIVE THEN PLEASE KILL YOURSELF," so that biasfags can know they arent welcome. [[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] 17:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)		::::On the other hand, polifags and religious fags tend to be extremely easy to troll due to their oversensitivity and attachment to popular correctness. I definitely see your argument though, you have a good point, but honestly I hope Krohn thinks we are raiding him for his beliefs, as it will make him more likely to bawww about how terrorists are persecuting him. The real problem is anons who think that we are doing this because he is conservative. I am not sure how to prevent that, I think I will put a little warning at the top that says "IF YOU ARE DOING THIS WITH POLITICAL MOTIVE THEN PLEASE KILL YOURSELF," so that biasfags can know they arent welcome. [[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] 17:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
	:::::I just don't think this is going to be successful, it's just going to get him sympathy. Besides, I happened to meet him at CPAC, he's a nice kid. Also for people bashing on Chanology, gtfo. --[[Special:Contributions/134.126.209.179\|134.126.209.179]] 17:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)		:::::I just don't think this is going to be successful, it's just going to get him sympathy. Besides, I happened to meet him at CPAC, he's a nice kid. Also for people bashing on Chanology, gtfo. --[[Special:Contributions/134.126.209.179\|134.126.209.179]] 17:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
	::::::we have nothing better to do in the meantime		::::::we have nothing better to do in the meantime [[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] 03:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

	:Yupyup. I myself lean pretty hard to the left, but I'm not doing this because of my political beliefs. I saw what happened with Chanology, and that's not a mistake we want to make twice. Moralfaggotry is not a valid raid motive.		:Yupyup. I myself lean pretty hard to the left, but I'm not doing this because of my political beliefs. I saw what happened with Chanology, and that's not a mistake we want to make twice. Moralfaggotry is not a valid raid motive.
	[[User:Robot Hitler\|Robot Hitler]] 06:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)		[[User:Robot Hitler\|Robot Hitler]] 06:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

>Maxwell at 03:38, 23 March 2009

2009-03-23T03:38:19Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:38, 23 March 2009
(No difference)

>Maxwell at 03:38, 23 March 2009

2009-03-23T03:38:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:38, 23 March 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::On the other hand, polifags and religious fags tend to be extremely easy to troll due to their oversensitivity and attachment to popular correctness. I definitely see your argument though, you have a good point, but honestly I hope Krohn thinks we are raiding him for his beliefs, as it will make him more likely to bawww about how terrorists are persecuting him. The real problem is anons who think that we are doing this because he is conservative. I am not sure how to prevent that, I think I will put a little warning at the top that says "IF YOU ARE DOING THIS WITH POLITICAL MOTIVE THEN PLEASE KILL YOURSELF," so that biasfags can know they arent welcome. [[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] 17:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)		::::On the other hand, polifags and religious fags tend to be extremely easy to troll due to their oversensitivity and attachment to popular correctness. I definitely see your argument though, you have a good point, but honestly I hope Krohn thinks we are raiding him for his beliefs, as it will make him more likely to bawww about how terrorists are persecuting him. The real problem is anons who think that we are doing this because he is conservative. I am not sure how to prevent that, I think I will put a little warning at the top that says "IF YOU ARE DOING THIS WITH POLITICAL MOTIVE THEN PLEASE KILL YOURSELF," so that biasfags can know they arent welcome. [[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] 17:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
	:::::I just don't think this is going to be successful, it's just going to get him sympathy. Besides, I happened to meet him at CPAC, he's a nice kid. Also for people bashing on Chanology, gtfo. --[[Special:Contributions/134.126.209.179\|134.126.209.179]] 17:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)		:::::I just don't think this is going to be successful, it's just going to get him sympathy. Besides, I happened to meet him at CPAC, he's a nice kid. Also for people bashing on Chanology, gtfo. --[[Special:Contributions/134.126.209.179\|134.126.209.179]] 17:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
			::::::we have nothing better to do in the meantime

	:Yupyup. I myself lean pretty hard to the left, but I'm not doing this because of my political beliefs. I saw what happened with Chanology, and that's not a mistake we want to make twice. Moralfaggotry is not a valid raid motive.		:Yupyup. I myself lean pretty hard to the left, but I'm not doing this because of my political beliefs. I saw what happened with Chanology, and that's not a mistake we want to make twice. Moralfaggotry is not a valid raid motive.
	[[User:Robot Hitler\|Robot Hitler]] 06:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)		[[User:Robot Hitler\|Robot Hitler]] 06:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

134.126.209.179 at 17:50, 19 March 2009

2009-03-19T17:50:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:50, 19 March 2009
(No difference)

134.126.209.179 at 17:50, 19 March 2009

2009-03-19T17:50:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:50, 19 March 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::The problem with raids on poltifags and religious fags is that they tend to act like the raid is because of their beliefs, not because of who they are. And some anons seem to think that way as well and either act beneficially or negatively towards the raid. [[User:Treybuchet\|Treybuchet]] 15:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)		:::The problem with raids on poltifags and religious fags is that they tend to act like the raid is because of their beliefs, not because of who they are. And some anons seem to think that way as well and either act beneficially or negatively towards the raid. [[User:Treybuchet\|Treybuchet]] 15:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
	::::On the other hand, polifags and religious fags tend to be extremely easy to troll due to their oversensitivity and attachment to popular correctness. I definitely see your argument though, you have a good point, but honestly I hope Krohn thinks we are raiding him for his beliefs, as it will make him more likely to bawww about how terrorists are persecuting him. The real problem is anons who think that we are doing this because he is conservative. I am not sure how to prevent that, I think I will put a little warning at the top that says "IF YOU ARE DOING THIS WITH POLITICAL MOTIVE THEN PLEASE KILL YOURSELF," so that biasfags can know they arent welcome. [[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] 17:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)		::::On the other hand, polifags and religious fags tend to be extremely easy to troll due to their oversensitivity and attachment to popular correctness. I definitely see your argument though, you have a good point, but honestly I hope Krohn thinks we are raiding him for his beliefs, as it will make him more likely to bawww about how terrorists are persecuting him. The real problem is anons who think that we are doing this because he is conservative. I am not sure how to prevent that, I think I will put a little warning at the top that says "IF YOU ARE DOING THIS WITH POLITICAL MOTIVE THEN PLEASE KILL YOURSELF," so that biasfags can know they arent welcome. [[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] 17:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
			:::::I just don't think this is going to be successful, it's just going to get him sympathy. Besides, I happened to meet him at CPAC, he's a nice kid. Also for people bashing on Chanology, gtfo. --[[Special:Contributions/134.126.209.179\|134.126.209.179]] 17:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

	:Yupyup. I myself lean pretty hard to the left, but I'm not doing this because of my political beliefs. I saw what happened with Chanology, and that's not a mistake we want to make twice. Moralfaggotry is not a valid raid motive.		:Yupyup. I myself lean pretty hard to the left, but I'm not doing this because of my political beliefs. I saw what happened with Chanology, and that's not a mistake we want to make twice. Moralfaggotry is not a valid raid motive.
	[[User:Robot Hitler\|Robot Hitler]] 06:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)		[[User:Robot Hitler\|Robot Hitler]] 06:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:50, 19 March 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::The problem with raids on poltifags and religious fags is that they tend to act like the raid is because of their beliefs, not because of who they are. And some anons seem to think that way as well and either act beneficially or negatively towards the raid. [[User:Treybuchet\|Treybuchet]] 15:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)		:::The problem with raids on poltifags and religious fags is that they tend to act like the raid is because of their beliefs, not because of who they are. And some anons seem to think that way as well and either act beneficially or negatively towards the raid. [[User:Treybuchet\|Treybuchet]] 15:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
	::::On the other hand, polifags and religious fags tend to be extremely easy to troll due to their oversensitivity and attachment to popular correctness. I definitely see your argument though, you have a good point, but honestly I hope Krohn thinks we are raiding him for his beliefs, as it will make him more likely to bawww about how terrorists are persecuting him. The real problem is anons who think that we are doing this because he is conservative. I am not sure how to prevent that, I think I will put a little warning at the top that says "IF YOU ARE DOING THIS WITH POLITICAL MOTIVE THEN PLEASE KILL YOURSELF," so that biasfags can know they arent welcome. [[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] 17:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)		::::On the other hand, polifags and religious fags tend to be extremely easy to troll due to their oversensitivity and attachment to popular correctness. I definitely see your argument though, you have a good point, but honestly I hope Krohn thinks we are raiding him for his beliefs, as it will make him more likely to bawww about how terrorists are persecuting him. The real problem is anons who think that we are doing this because he is conservative. I am not sure how to prevent that, I think I will put a little warning at the top that says "IF YOU ARE DOING THIS WITH POLITICAL MOTIVE THEN PLEASE KILL YOURSELF," so that biasfags can know they arent welcome. [[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] 17:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
			:::::I just don't think this is going to be successful, it's just going to get him sympathy. Besides, I happened to meet him at CPAC, he's a nice kid. Also for people bashing on Chanology, gtfo. --[[Special:Contributions/134.126.209.179\|134.126.209.179]] 17:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

	:Yupyup. I myself lean pretty hard to the left, but I'm not doing this because of my political beliefs. I saw what happened with Chanology, and that's not a mistake we want to make twice. Moralfaggotry is not a valid raid motive.		:Yupyup. I myself lean pretty hard to the left, but I'm not doing this because of my political beliefs. I saw what happened with Chanology, and that's not a mistake we want to make twice. Moralfaggotry is not a valid raid motive.
	[[User:Robot Hitler\|Robot Hitler]] 06:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)		[[User:Robot Hitler\|Robot Hitler]] 06:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)