Talk:L/i/nux - Revision history

Chipmunk: Fix a link

2024-12-07T04:30:21Z

Fix a link

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:30, 7 December 2024
Line 23:		Line 23:
	-[[User:Red Dragon 004\|Red Dragon 004]]		-[[User:Red Dragon 004\|Red Dragon 004]]

	*[http://~~anonym~~.to/http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Lulznix], we already tried and failed. Why not remix an existing distribution at first, and then, once enough anons are actively contributing going distro? --[[User:The Fire of Delight\|The Fire of Delight]] 11:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)		*[http://web.archive.org/web/20090214111405/http://encyclopediadramatica.com:80/Lulznix], we already tried and failed. Why not remix an existing distribution at first, and then, once enough anons are actively contributing going distro? --[[User:The Fire of Delight\|The Fire of Delight]] 11:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

	== openSUSE ==		== openSUSE ==

2011-05-28T18:24:47Z

what will sys reqs be?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:24, 28 May 2011
Line 83:		Line 83:

	I'd say make it compatible with intel-processor macOSX. The amount of people using these computers on college campus' is nuts, it would open up a whole new population of people to use this distro.		I'd say make it compatible with intel-processor macOSX. The amount of people using these computers on college campus' is nuts, it would open up a whole new population of people to use this distro.

			Apple fanbitches, I say. Still, worth a shot since anything's better than some OS you can't do shit with.

	== Aireplay/Airodump ==		== Aireplay/Airodump ==

2010-07-30T18:09:57Z

This is L/i/nux, not W/i/ndows

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 30 July 2010
Line 58:		Line 58:

	GNOME and KDE and all the rest of the desktop environments are too bloated, we should use Openbox.		GNOME and KDE and all the rest of the desktop environments are too bloated, we should use Openbox.
			* GNOME isn't bad. KDE is mac. If you are looking for speed I would use XFCE.

	== Removable-Media Bootable ==		== Removable-Media Bootable ==

2010-07-30T18:08:33Z

Re-branded Firefox?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 30 July 2010
Line 51:		Line 51:
	There will be normal Firefox included or we are going to re-brand it? --[[User:Asdzxcman\|asdzxcman]] 23:27, 28 December 2008 (UTC)<br />		There will be normal Firefox included or we are going to re-brand it? --[[User:Asdzxcman\|asdzxcman]] 23:27, 28 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
	I will probably take firefox suace and edit it for rebranding for us. Any ideas? (inb4 firekip)		I will probably take firefox suace and edit it for rebranding for us. Any ideas? (inb4 firekip)
			*Why bother, we are all big kids here, why not just use normal firefox, and if you want addons install them yourself? (It would cut down on the filesize as well)

	== This is L/i/nux, not W/i/ndows ==		== This is L/i/nux, not W/i/ndows ==

2010-07-30T18:06:47Z

openSUSE

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 30 July 2010
Line 30:		Line 30:
	* SUSE is one of the worst distributions around. It is pretty bad to work with and the RPM system sucks so bad. Debian or Ubuntu would be easier to work with.		* SUSE is one of the worst distributions around. It is pretty bad to work with and the RPM system sucks so bad. Debian or Ubuntu would be easier to work with.
	*^^ Also, fuck looking like windows. The first thing we need to worry about is usability, the last is making shit look pretty. --[[User:The Fire of Delight\|The Fire of Delight]] 11:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)		*^^ Also, fuck looking like windows. The first thing we need to worry about is usability, the last is making shit look pretty. --[[User:The Fire of Delight\|The Fire of Delight]] 11:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
			** Firstly KDE looks like fucking M-A-C secondly ^^ this^^.

	== Anonix/Anon core utils ==		== Anonix/Anon core utils ==

2010-07-30T18:05:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:05, 30 July 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Why not go with Backtrack? It's mission seems more or less the same, just without the trolling.		Why not go with Backtrack? It's mission seems more or less the same, just without the trolling.
	* I agree, just add some extra programs and make some basic changes to Backtrack, which is already a powerhouse distro made specifically to penetrate security. It is also friendly for windows users. The company even offers a course about how to use the Backtrack for "Offensive Security" purposes i.e. penetrate networks and shit, but it requires jewgold. Luckily a very detailed lab manual can be torrented.		* I agree, just add some extra programs and make some basic changes to Backtrack, which is already a powerhouse distro made specifically to penetrate security. It is also friendly for windows users. The company even offers a course about how to use the Backtrack for "Offensive Security" purposes i.e. penetrate networks and shit, but it requires jewgold. Luckily a very detailed lab manual can be torrented.
			** New backtrack is ubuntu 8.(something) and would be relatively easy to create a custom distro of, if we used the "Custom Livecd" thing that is in the ubuntu repositories.
	== Status report ==		== Status report ==

2010-06-12T06:24:22Z

moved Talk:Insurgency Linux to Talk:L/i/nux over redirect: don't fuck with the name

← Older revision	Revision as of 06:24, 12 June 2010
(No difference)

2010-06-09T00:53:52Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:53, 9 June 2010
(No difference)

2010-06-06T16:22:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 6 June 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	[[User:Failfaag\|Failfaag]]		[[User:Failfaag\|Failfaag]]

	I'd prefer if we could keep away from both ubuntu and gnome, arch+openbox would probably be the best choice. --[[User:Drifter\|Drifter]] 16:15, 6 June 2010 (UTC)		I'd prefer if we could keep away from both ubuntu and gnome, arch+openbox would probably be the best choice. But if you start working on mixing those two remixes and then adding all the anon stuff I'll join you. --[[User:Drifter\|Drifter]] 16:15, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

	== New distro ==		== New distro ==

2010-06-06T16:15:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:15, 6 June 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:
	i wat like amix of http://www.gnacktrack.co.uk/ and http://ubuntustudio.org/ and lots of anon shit		i wat like amix of http://www.gnacktrack.co.uk/ and http://ubuntustudio.org/ and lots of anon shit
	[[User:Failfaag\|Failfaag]]		[[User:Failfaag\|Failfaag]]

			I'd prefer if we could keep away from both ubuntu and gnome, arch+openbox would probably be the best choice. --[[User:Drifter\|Drifter]] 16:15, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

	== New distro ==		== New distro ==