>Hitlerlol: Created page with 'where's the evidence that AT is behind it? oh well nvm... I think AT should be the default target everytime anyone spams /b/ "Vorked, one of the many hard working individuals do...'

2010-07-30T18:07:55Z

Created page with 'where's the evidence that AT is behind it? oh well nvm... I think AT should be the default target everytime anyone spams /b/ "Vorked, one of the many hard working individuals do...'

New page

where's the evidence that AT is behind it?
oh well nvm... I think AT should be the default target everytime anyone spams /b/

"Vorked, one of the many hard working individuals doing what they can to set things right, was SODD'd offline early into the attacks. Vorked got back up recently and brought some offending IPs with him. Turns out our good friends over at AT.com were responsible."

Yeah, It has been confirmed multiple times that anontalk are the ones spamming /b/.

Although, they have tried to blame it on multiple chans, such as:
# Raidchan
# 99chan
# 888chan
# 711chan

== POSSIBLE CYCLE ==

I think this battle cannot be won, there is a cycle for example

1.anontalk spams /b/

2.we ddos anontalk

3.anontalk is down

4.EPIC WIN FOR ANONYMOUS

5.anontalk is up again

steps 1 through 5 repeat it self

Talk:Project Internet Boss - Revision history

>Hitlerlol: Created page with 'where's the evidence that AT is behind it? oh well nvm... I think AT should be the default target everytime anyone spams /b/ "Vorked, one of the many hard working individuals do...'