Talk:Project Chanology: Difference between revisions
From /i/nsurgency W/i/ki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
-can it be referred to as ''Project Chanology'' on the front page as opposed to ''Chanology''? sounds cooler ^.^ | -can it be referred to as ''Project Chanology'' on the front page as opposed to ''Chanology''? sounds cooler ^.^ | ||
== == | == == | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
perhaps we should focus on that? | perhaps we should focus on that? | ||
:Sounds good to me [[Special:Contributions/74.76.228.93|74.76.228.93]] 00:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
=== | === | ||
Is there an LRon soundboard? Could make for lulzy battletoads. | Is there an LRon soundboard? Could make for lulzy battletoads. | ||
Revision as of 00:56, 16 April 2009
told you faggots Maxwell 19:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
-can it be referred to as Project Chanology on the front page as opposed to Chanology? sounds cooler ^.^
judging by the discussion thread, the idea of ddosing scientology is not supported. It's been investigated and apparently, no matter how they are attacked, they'll spin it to make money from followers.
so, many of the moralfags at wwp want to be involved, but don't want to do anything that could get them v&. Operation Battletoads (last march, prank calls) as well as psychological play, invasion of forums and communities and getting dox doesnt seem to have many objections.
perhaps we should focus on that?
- Sounds good to me 74.76.228.93 00:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
=
Is there an LRon soundboard? Could make for lulzy battletoads.
