Talk:Jonathan Krohn: Difference between revisions

From /i/nsurgency W/i/ki
Jump to navigationJump to search
>Treybuchet
No edit summary
>Treybuchet
No edit summary
(No difference)

Revision as of 15:40, 15 March 2009

This was on 711 and everyone simultaniously decided it sucked. Attacking someone because you dont like there political beliefs is the kind of beekeeping that got chanology going.

I agree. Anon has to defend this as a source of lulz or it gets taken off the w/i/ki.
I agree with that too, we must avoid siding ourselves with Marxists, Socialists and other degenerate political groups, look what happened when we raided McKay Hatch, it only gave him more publicity as "the most cyber bullied kid in America". Unless there is a compelling reason why we should raid him this page should be removed.
Also sign your comments negroes, with four tildes (~~~~) -- Yakk 17:32, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
The reason I put it up is because there is a serious chance that he could baawwww, or even take his site offline, if we manage to fuck with him enough. It has nothing to do with his actual beliefs. PS: I intend to remove this as soon as a better raid comes along, feel free to make suggestions Maxwell 17:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
The problem with raids on poltifags and religious fags is that they tend to act like the raid is because of their beliefs, not because of who they are. And some anons seem to think that way as well and either act beneficially or negatively towards the raid. Treybuchet 15:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)