Talk:Jonathan Krohn

From /i/nsurgency W/i/ki
Revision as of 22:45, 25 March 2009 by >Maxwell (Reverted edits by 207.119.71.76 (Talk) to last version by Maxwell)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

This was on 711 and everyone simultaniously decided it sucked. Attacking someone because you dont like there political beliefs is the kind of beekeeping that got chanology going.

I agree. Anon has to defend this as a source of lulz or it gets taken off the w/i/ki.
I agree with that too, we must avoid siding ourselves with Marxists, Socialists and other degenerate political groups, look what happened when we raided McKay Hatch, it only gave him more publicity as "the most cyber bullied kid in America". Unless there is a compelling reason why we should raid him this page should be removed.
Also sign your comments negroes, with four tildes (~~~~) -- Yakk 17:32, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
The reason I put it up is because there is a serious chance that he could baawwww, or even take his site offline, if we manage to fuck with him enough. It has nothing to do with his actual beliefs. PS: I intend to remove this as soon as a better raid comes along, feel free to make suggestions Maxwell 17:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
The problem with raids on poltifags and religious fags is that they tend to act like the raid is because of their beliefs, not because of who they are. And some anons seem to think that way as well and either act beneficially or negatively towards the raid. Treybuchet 15:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
On the other hand, polifags and religious fags tend to be extremely easy to troll due to their oversensitivity and attachment to popular correctness. I definitely see your argument though, you have a good point, but honestly I hope Krohn thinks we are raiding him for his beliefs, as it will make him more likely to bawww about how terrorists are persecuting him. The real problem is anons who think that we are doing this because he is conservative. I am not sure how to prevent that, I think I will put a little warning at the top that says "IF YOU ARE DOING THIS WITH POLITICAL MOTIVE THEN PLEASE KILL YOURSELF," so that biasfags can know they arent welcome. Maxwell 17:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
I just don't think this is going to be successful, it's just going to get him sympathy. Besides, I happened to meet him at CPAC, he's a nice kid. Also for people bashing on Chanology, gtfo. --134.126.209.179 17:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
we have nothing better to do in the meantime Maxwell 03:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Yupyup. I myself lean pretty hard to the left, but I'm not doing this because of my political beliefs. I saw what happened with Chanology, and that's not a mistake we want to make twice. Moralfaggotry is not a valid raid motive.

Robot Hitler 06:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)